I suppose the best way then is to loudly and frequently talk about the things they are doing, like Private Relay, blocking email fingerprinting (or whatever it's called), device encrypted content and messages (and facetime?)(but not email it seems), etc. I suppose it's quite a bit more difficult than I hoped for Apple to make some dramatic statements, which may need quite a few caveats and conditions that would take away from the impact and make it hard to convince others. The only thing that matters is law.” /technology-3/1/whats-up-with-apple-10-billion-for-privacy-ar-headset-coming-and-more/Is there a lot to consider including care in interpreting the language used to describe 'policy' vs potential 'by design' that leaves reliance entirely on policy that is 'subject to change' or worse yet a hack.?Įxcellent list of points and questions, thanks for putting all that together. In an opinion piece posted on the same day, the Financial Times’s Brooke Masters notes that it is “ risky to rely on noblesse oblige,” citing Harvard law professor Shoshana Zuboff: “These commitments change with the market winds. "Apple CEO Tim Cook continues to pound the idea that Apple “believe strongly that privacy is a basic human right.” Alphabet/Google claims similar high-mindedness. "Ultimately, over time, this device-based strategy will prove Apple's undoing as it eventually admits it does need your personal data.
OLD MAC VS PC COMMERCIALS MAC
Would offering a remote user mac Apple Server Application (/us/app/macos-server/id883878097?) to offer remote distributed in house sync (or even local direct connected device sync) be more private solutions for all concerned, not unlike the web itself that was designed to be 'distributed' and thus less vulnerable to attack or surveillance ? Is there a lot to consider including care in interpreting the language used to describe 'policy' vs potential 'by design' that leaves reliance entirely on policy that is 'subject to change' or worse yet a hack.? The only thing that matters is law.” /technology-3/1/whats-up-with-apple-10-billion-for-privacy-ar-headset-coming-and-more/ And has done all along."Ī/articles/21/12/08/apple-reportedly-allowing-looser-adherence-to-ad-privacy-rules-requirements " Ultimately, over time, this device-based strategy will prove Apple's undoing as it eventually admits it does need your personal data. "It's clear that Apple doesn't want to get to know you to sell your data to third parties, but it doesn't mean it doesn't want to get to know you for their own purposes."
![old mac vs pc commercials old mac vs pc commercials](https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5bb35a183c000032000c5d4e.jpeg)
OLD MAC VS PC COMMERCIALS PRO
Is S/MIME the only Apple independent (7:30) option and could this be more easily facilitated ? Why does remote wipe require 'Find My iPhone' location tracking to be enabled - quid pro quo 'by design'.?Īlso there is the question of all the contact data & even profile photos that others put in the Contacts app without one's knowledge and is being synced remotely aka uploaded to Apple iCloud servers.? Why are iCloud servers required to sync local hardware ?Īpple tech confirmed Apple Watch (with biometric data) requires iCloud to (function) sync. I understood Apple has a key to every account: /apple/#/Įmail remains unencrypted per "iCloud does not encrypt data stored on IMAP mail servers." /en-us/HT202303Īt last check Photos auto tags every image for search - where is a global off switch.? 'Apple doesn't possess that special key to read the data' ? (5:35)